ETS · engineering that holds up

Choose the material for the real duty cycle—not just the datasheet.

Compare candidate polymers against load, temperature, chemicals, life, manufacturing process and qualification requirements. Turn a property shortlist into an engineering decision with explicit trade-offs.

Engineering scope

Start with the decisions that matter.

Mechanical life

Consider strain, creep, fatigue, impact and temperature together, not isolated room-temperature strength.

Environment and compatibility

Identify chemicals, moisture, sterilization, UV and other exposures that change behavior over the product life.

Manufacturing and qualification

Review molding, joining, tolerances, appearance, supply constraints and required qualification evidence.

How the engagement works

A structured path from question to evidence.

Define requirements

Capture geometry, loads, life, operating environment, production process and relevant standards.

Compare candidates

Build a requirements and trade-off matrix. Identify missing data and questions for material suppliers.

Plan qualification

Define tests and acceptance criteria appropriate to the application; database similarity is not qualification.

Record the decision

Document candidates, assumptions, risks, supplier questions and the agreed validation plan.

Agree the output before work begins

A decision record—not an unexplained verdict.

Defined scope and assumptions

Agree the question, available inputs, limits of the review and the expected decision before technical work begins.

Evidence and engineering rationale

Document the information considered, alternative explanations or candidates, trade-offs and outstanding uncertainty.

Verification and next actions

Define recommended changes or tests and the evidence required to judge whether the result meets the application.

Prepare the discussion

Bring the part context. Protect confidential information.

Useful starting information includes photographs, drawings, material grade, process history, loading, environment, timeline and available samples. Start with a non-confidential description; arrange an appropriate transfer method for sensitive files after scoping.

Testing capabilities, schedule, deliverables and fees are agreed for the engagement. A database comparison alone does not establish compliance or suitability.

Put the next step on the calendar.

Tell us the application, the decision and what is at stake. We will help identify the appropriate next step.

Scope a material review →