Automotive Quality Core Tools: APQP, PPAP, MSA, SPC & 8D
The five core tools as one launch discipline — APQP phases, the 18-element PPAP package, Gage R&R measurement systems analysis, SPC starter set, and 8D corrective action — taught with polymer-specific launch failure modes (weld lines, warp, shrinkage) no generic quality course covers.
Get notified when this course is scheduled
One email when dates are set. Or skip the wait: run it as a private cohort, on-site at your plant.
- One email, no sequence
- Never shared
- Reply within one business day
Faculty
Faculty details for this seminar will be announced with the full schedule.
Fees
Early: $1,895 (payment 4+ weeks ahead)
Standard: $2,095 (check/ACH) · $2,165 (card)
Group discount: $200 off per attendee for 3+ from the same organization.
Also Available
- Corporate on-site delivery at your facility
- Private cohort sessions
- Digital curriculum licensing
Seminar Overview
Every automotive program runs on the five core tools, yet almost no engineer is ever formally taught them on plastic parts: APQP arrives as a customer form, PPAP as an 18-element checklist, MSA as a Gage R&R spreadsheet, and 8D as a template somebody else fills in. This seminar teaches the core tools as what they actually are — one integrated launch-control discipline — using plastic-part examples throughout: dimensional PPAPs on warp-prone housings, Gage R&R on features where shrinkage and creep move the part between measurements, and 8Ds where the root cause is a weld line the design put in the wrong place.
The course is grounded in the AIAG core-tool manuals and the NIST engineering statistics handbook (already in the ETS knowledge corpus), with the polymer layer that generic quality training cannot supply: why PPAP dimensional packages on plastics need shrinkage allowance philosophy stated up front, why capability studies on glass-filled grades need moisture-conditioning control, and how the DVP&R, FMEA, and PPAP artifacts interlock on a molded part program.
Attendees leave with the complete vocabulary their OEM customers use, a PPAP package skeleton they can reuse, and the judgment to know when a plastic part's quality plan needs to deviate from the generic automotive script — and how to document that deviation so it survives the customer's SQE review.
Ideal Learner
- Supplier quality engineers (SQE) and quality managers at Tier-1/Tier-2 plastics suppliers
- Design and process engineers preparing or defending PPAP submissions
- Launch/APQP coordinators and program quality leads
- Quality staff at molders and CDMOs serving automotive and regulated customers
Learning Objectives
- Lay out a complete APQP plan for a molded-part program, phase by phase
- Assemble the 18-element PPAP package and know which elements plastics make non-trivial
- Run and interpret a Gage R&R on plastic-part features where the part itself moves
- Set up SPC on molding processes: which characteristics, which charts, which rules
- Lead an 8D where the root cause is a design decision, not a process drift
- Connect DVP&R, FMEA, and PPAP artifacts into one traceable launch record
Consulting Sessions
Seminar attendees can sign up for individual consulting sessions with the instructor. Sessions are free for registered attendees, first-come first-served — sign up when registering by calling 248-539-0473 or during the seminar.
Seminar Outline
- The five phases and what 'complete' means per phase
- Translating customer-specific requirements (CSR) into a control plan
- Design verification vs. process validation on molded parts
- The polymer-specific timing traps: tooling lead time, material qualification, moisture conditioning
- Element-by-element walkthrough on a live housing example
- Dimensional results with shrinkage philosophy stated
- Appearance approval reports (AAR) for Class-A surfaces
- Capturing customer-specific requirements without missing them
- Why plastics break naive Gage R&R: creep, moisture, temperature
- Variable and attribute studies on molded features
- Fixing a failed study: fixture design, fixturing strategy, datum targets
- Repeatability vs. reproducibility on soft, warpy parts
- Choosing characteristics worth charting on a molding process
- Variables charts in cavity-pressure world: what to chart and why
- Capability (Cpk/Ppk) on skewed and time-dependent distributions
- Out-of-control action plans that end in the mold, not in a memo
- D1-D3: team, problem description, containment on field failures
- D4 done right: is/is-not analysis that lands on the weld line
- The five-whys discipline with fishbone on a real warp claim
- D5-D8: corrective action that changes the design or the tool — and the read-across lesson
- How DVP&R, PFMEA, control plan, and PPAP interlock
- Traceability from customer requirement to process parameter
- The annual-review and change-control loop
- Workshop: assemble a launch package for a sample part
More in Track L — Quality & Launch Standards
- L-02 · GD&T and Tolerance Stack-Up for Plastic Parts (ASME Y14.5 / ISO GPS) — 2-day · Intermediate
- L-03 · FMEA and DVP&R Discipline for Plastic Programs (AIAG-VDA) — 2-day · Intermediate-Advanced